requestId:684d90ea181789.78763286.
The road to learning is never a straightforward
Author: Sun Haiyan
Source: “Studying and Discussing in Education” WeChat Public Number
Time: Confucius was in the 2570s, April 28th of Gengzi, Guihai
Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;”>
Sun Haiyan, born in 1978, is from Juancheng, Shandong. He is a famous student named Sun Qilu, a Ph.D. in Philosophy, Zhongshan. He is currently an associate researcher at the Institute of Philosophy and Religious Research, Guangdong Academy of Social Sciences. The purpose of important research and development is Confucian philosophy, Chinese thinking history, and Chinese and foreign humanistic discussions. He published a book-based study and published a book-based study and published a study on the history of the development of Confucianism with characters as his heart (Taiwan Huamulan Civilization Book Club, 2013), and studied the ancient book “Huang Liaozi’s Poem Collection” (Shanghai Ancient Book Club, 2017), and published more than 30 academic papers in academic journals such as “History of Chinese Philosophy”, “My Character and Civilization”, “Confucius Research”, “Opening Age”, and “Yuanhu” Monthly (Taiwan).
01When did you start to learn from this door? How profound?
Since April this year, Brother Xiang suddenly released a WeChat public platform for “Cleaning up and discussing academic literature”, and “Young scholars’ visits and discussions” has been asked. The two first students to receive the interview are the second brothers Song Lilin and Yang Shaohan, who I am more familiar with. After I saw it, I followed this platform. Unexpectedly, I just published a few articles in my circle and clicked a few words to receive a message from Brother Xiang, asking me to accept the interview and write the previous article for the column. I am actually an insider, so I can only try my best to find some designs that are close to the topic.
Before I was studying for a doctorate, I focused mostly on literature, which was almost at ease, and there was no shadow of “governance”. Of course, you will also read books related to learning. For the purpose of “Theory”, I have read Li Zehou’s “The Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the In this kind of experience, there is no need to mention it in detail here.
I think carefully that I can be considered as accepting a little training in academic literature, or when I was studying Dr. Zhongzhe in the Department of Philosophy of Zhongshan. I remember that during the first period of my studies, the department head teacher Li Honglei started the “Pre-Qin Confucianism” course, aiming to guide the researchers to read some pre-Qin Confucian classics. The first thing to read is of course “Theory”. After Teacher Li talked about the first class, he assigned the next task and decided that a classmate would read a chapter in the next class. As for the version, there is no unified request. The master uses Zhu Xi, Liu Baonan, Yang Bojun, Cheng Shude, Huang Shi San, Momo, Li Zehou and other versions. In my memory, some classmates seem to have used Nan Qingjin’s “Speech of the Discussion”, and they always say that Nan Qingjin was taught by Teacher Li on the spot. I used Cheng Shude’s “A Collection of Speeches” in class, and I also had books by Yang Bojun, Xuan Mu, Li Zehou and others. When I was preparing for the class, I would like to refer to the situation. This class is mostly about doctoral students and jurist students along the way. There are always more than twenty people in the class. First, a designated student speaks, and the teacher will give it to you at any time, and other students will also participate in discussions. Later, I read “Zangzi” with Teacher Zhang Yongyi and also adopted this method. There are also teachers Chen Lixing who lead the master to read “Traditional Records”, teachers Rong Xian led the master to read “Naru Nirvana”, etc., but the version is unified. Some students cannot buy it, so they can print one. I remember that this kind of course is often not enough to finish reading as scheduled, and in the end I can only choose to read and skip reading, which feels a bit of a thrust.
This course-taking method has long been widely used in the teaching of relevant professional graduate students. But for me, who had not been trained in a formal manner before, it was very fresh. When I was studying Chinese during my undergraduate studies, I had a little bit of the roots of modern Han Chinese. I was not bad at reading verbal words. When I started this class, I felt happy. There was a period of time during this period. I hated myself for not having my old school skills. I was anxious to add some lessons. Finally, I came up with a stupid way, which was to put my legs on the bed like Gu Jingbubo, and I wrote “Online” in my bed. After persisting for many days, I finally successfully passed the chapter “Study and the Country” to “Ming”. But the “County Party” is actually rigid and boring. I don’t know what’s going on, and I can’t hold on. At that time, I was just thirty years old and my ability to memorize books was already very poor. After joining the task, I wanted to start a new job. At most, I should memorize “Theory”, but this has become a difficult task to test perseverance and is still left unresolved. Song Wei was stunned for a moment when he could rely on his son, then pursed his lips and smiled, “Chen Jubai, you are so stupid.” He got on.
At that time, the “On the Discussion on the Philosophy History Research Methods” course by Teacher Chen Shaoming was also very important to my development. He importantly talked about some methods and ways of academic research. This course and literary reading course are complemented by each other. The materials he put in are mostly in the pre-Qin Confucianism, or maybe the “Zangzi” is added. It was in the middle-aged series that I had a little bit of learning. At that time, I wrote an article titled “A Brief Introduction to the Thoughts of Confucius, Mencius and Xunzi”, which was a bit of thought about the Confucianism of the pre-Qin Dynasty. After submitting the manuscript to “Confucius Research”, I waited for a year and finished my graduation.大官网 posted on. In a course article “Zi Teng’s Abstraction and Confucian Value”, Teacher Li Honglei gave me a very high score, and later published it in the “Confucian Journal” compiled by Teacher Yang Chaoming.
My doctoral thesis was studied by Yang Cihu, a famous scholar of the Song Dynasty (Simplified). With his teacher, Liuxiangshan’s “not-establishing words”, Yangci Lake has almost been a student, no matter how he is considered a scholar. Of course, this person’s disputes in the history of Confucianism are relatively large, and most scholars think he is “the yang Confucian Yin”. Yang’s method of solving the problem is the classic “Six Notes Me”, and his personal color is very prominent. Before choosing a paper topic, I saw a student who specializes in his PhD and Easy Studies in his Poetry. In his writing, it was discovered that Taiwanese scholar Zhang Niancheng studied Cihu’s “mind learning and learning problems”. I am a person with poor quality, but I prefer to be far-reaching. I have the idea of ”seeking understanding” in my studies, especially I don’t want to take care of the narrow and deep discussion. Although this article takes “Cihu Mind Learning” as the topic, it actually uses this as a key point to briefly clarify some of the main problems in the Confucian Mind Learning. I mentioned that when Brother Xiang, when I received this interview, I specifically reminded me to discuss “Cihu Poetry”, which made me feel more ashamed. At that time, I wrote a discussion to explore Cihu’s core studies. The important text was “Cihu ViagraBaocai VIP Book”. As for books such as “Cihu Poetry” and “Yang Yixun”, I just simply read it and felt that it was irrelevant to the essence, so I let it go. Therefore, Cihu’s “Praise” is “already lost at that time” to me, and I have never read it serious